Spectacular Action & Production Design
Expect jaw-dropping, high-octane action sequences—bullets, glove-ins, swordplay, and sprawling chase scenes across trains, planes, and snowy vistas dominate the screen. Production values and sleek stunts strike a visual chord.
Subpar Visual Effects (VFX)
Across reviews, CGI and special effects are a common sore point—described as flat, jarringly outdated, even likened to poor-quality video games by several viewers.
Weak Screenplay & Narrative Structure
The plot falters in coherence and pacing, particularly in the second half. Flashbacks feel dragged out, twists become predictable, and narrative logic takes a back seat. Multiple sources flagged this as a key letdown.
Underutilized Cast & Emotional Gaps
Kiara Advani’s character lacks depth and screen time. Emotional connections and stronger narratives for supporting characters fall short.
Audience Reception: Mixed
While the first half received praise for its injection of energy, many audience members dubbed the movie “mid”—not bad, but not remarkable either.
Verdict at a Glance
-
High-energy action and dazzling star power elevate the cinematic experience.
-
Sadly, narrative flaws and weak VFX undermine much of this.
-
Worth a one-time theatrical watch if you're drawn to star-studded spectacle—but temper expectations if you're after a gripping, well-rounded spy thriller.
| Source | Rating / Summary |
|---|---|
| Indian Express | 1.5 / 5 – “glossy snooze-fest” (The Indian Express) |
| Times of India | 3.0 / 5 – Strong visuals but momentum loss (The Times of India) |
| Moneycontrol | 3 / 5 – Thrills over substance (Moneycontrol) |
| News18, Firstpost, Variety |
2–2.5 / 5 – Mixed to negative consensus (Wikipedia) |
Comments
Post a Comment