π¬ Vikings vs Game of Thrones — Which One Is Actually Better?
“Dragons… or longships?
Fantasy kingdoms… or real blood-soaked history?
Today we’re comparing two legendary TV series —
π₯ Vikings
and
π Game of Thrones
Which one is more popular?
Which one tells the stronger story?
And is Vikings really based on true events?
Let’s find out.”
Vikings — History or Fiction?
Vikings (2013–2020) originally aired on the History Channel.
The story centers around the legendary Norse warrior
π Ragnar Lothbrok
π What Is It About?
The series explores:
Viking society in Scandinavia
Raids on England and Francia
Sea exploration and discovery
Politics, religion, betrayal, and family conflict
In later seasons, major focus shifts to:
Bjorn Ironside
Ivar the Boneless
πΊ Is Vikings Based on a True Story?
This is the big question.
Ragnar Lothbrok appears in Norse sagas and medieval texts.
However, there is no solid historical proof that he existed exactly as portrayed.
His sons, especially Bjorn and Ivar, are more historically credible figures.
So we can say:
Vikings = roughly 40% history + 60% dramatized storytelling.
Timelines were compressed.
Characters were merged or reimagined.
Events were altered for dramatic impact.
However, Viking culture, ships, weapons, and religious elements are portrayed with considerable authenticity.
Game of Thrones — A Complete Fantasy Empire
Game of Thrones is based on the book series
π A Song of Ice and Fire
written by
π George R. R. Martin
π What Is It About?
The story revolves around:
The battle for the Iron Throne
Political conspiracies
Powerful rival families
War, betrayal, ambition
And of course — dragons π
Unlike Vikings, this show is set in a completely fictional world featuring magic, White Walkers, and mythical creatures.
However, its political drama and medieval atmosphere are inspired by real historical conflicts like the Wars of the Roses.
Head-to-Head Comparison
π 1. Storytelling Style
Vikings
Slower, character-focused storytelling
Deep emotional arcs
Strong emphasis on family dynamics
Game of Thrones
Massive ensemble cast
Multiple kingdoms and storylines
Complex political strategy
π° 2. Production Value
Game of Thrones had an enormous budget.
Large-scale battle sequences, CGI dragons, massive sets.
One of the most expensive TV series ever made.
Vikings had a smaller budget but maintained strong realism in costumes, sets, and cinematography.
⭐ 3. Popularity & Audience Reception
Game of Thrones became a global cultural phenomenon.
Won numerous Emmy Awards.
IMDb rating: around 9.2
Vikings holds an IMDb rating around 8.5
Extremely popular within history and medieval-drama fans.
Globally speaking,
Game of Thrones leads in overall popularity and awards.
However, its final season received heavy criticism,
while Vikings maintained more consistency toward its ending.
π¬ Audience Perspective
History lovers usually prefer Vikings.
Fantasy and political-drama fans prefer Game of Thrones.
If you enjoy realism and brutality grounded in history → Vikings.
If you love dragons, epic wars, and layered political schemes → Game of Thrones.
π Final Verdict
Choose Vikings if you prefer:
π‘️ Historical drama
⚔️ Realistic warfare
π Viking culture and exploration
Choose Game of Thrones if you prefer:
π Fantasy elements
π Political complexity
π₯ High-budget spectacle
“So what’s your pick?
Vikings… or Game of Thrones?
Let us know in the comments.
And don’t forget to like, subscribe, and turn on notifications for more deep comparisons like this.”
Comments
Post a Comment